Independence of ap propagation velocity to transjunctional voltage dependence of gap junctional coupling
Author Affiliations1Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, 400076, India, Mumbai, Powai
2Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, 400076, India, Mumbai, Powai
Abstract
Gap junctions are protein structures that form transmembrane channels between adjacent cells, thereby allowing the direct passage of ions and small molecules. They play an important role in the physiological functioning of the individual cells, and also the tissue. Experimental studies have reported a variety of gap junction subtypes, with differences in their biophysical properties, such as their unitary conductances and sensitivity to transjunctional voltage. Our study aims at computationally exploring the effect of these differences towards the spread of action potentials in syncytial tissues. Results from our simulations suggest that the propagation velocity of action potentials is independent of the transjunctional voltage dependence of the gap junction subtype. The propagation velocity was found to be constant across all subtypes tested, when the maximal conductances were set equal. This was verified using action potentials of widely varying time courses. We attribute this trend to the much slower gating kinetics of gap junctions in comparison to the time course of action potentials, and more specifically the short period where a significant transjunctional voltage is maintained.
Key words
References
- Appukuttan S., Brain K.L., Manchanda R. A computational model of urinary bladder smooth muscle syncytium // J. Comput. Neurosci. 2015. 38. (1). 167–187.
- Appukuttan S., Brain K., Manchanda R. Syncytial basis for diversity in spike shapes and their propagation in detrusor smooth muscle // Procedia Comput. Sci. 2015. 51. 785–794.
- Appukuttan S., Sathe R., Manchanda R. Modular approach to modeling homotypic and heterotypic gap junctions // ICCABS: Proc. IEEE 5th Int. Conf. Miami, 2015. 1–6.
- Appukuttan S., Sathe R., Manchanda R. Influence of gap junction subtypes on passive and active electrical properties of syncytial tissues // ICSMB: Proc. Int. Conf. Kharagpur, 2016. [in press].
- Desplantez T., Dupont E., Severs N.J., Weingart R. Gap junction channels and cardiac impulse propagation // J. Membr. Biol. 2007. 218. (1–3). 13–28.
- Hodgkin A.L., Katz B. The effect of temperature on the electrical activity of the giant axon of the squid // J. Physiol. 1949. 109. (1-2). 240–249.
- Lin X., Crye M., Veenstra R.D. Regulation of connexin43 gap junctional conductance by ventricular action potentials // Circ. Res. 2003. 93. (6). e63–e73.
- Mese G., Richard G., White T.W. Gap junctions: basic structure and function // J. Invest. Dermatol. 2007. 127. (11). 2516–2524.
- Moreno A.P., Laing J.G., Beyer E.C., Spray D.C. Properties of gap junction channels formed of connexin 45 endogenously expressed in human hepatoma (SKHep1) cells // Am J Physiol. 1995. 268. (2 Pt 1). C356–C365.
- Musa H., Veenstra R.D. Voltage-dependent blockade of connexin40 gap junctions by spermine // Biophys. J. 2003. 84. (1). 205–219.
- White T.W., Bruzzone R. Multiple connexin proteins in single intercellular channels: connexin compatibility and functional consequences // J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 1996. 28. (4). 339–350.
About Authors (Correspondence):
Appukuttan S. – Ph.D., Computational NeuroPhysiology Laboratory, e-mai: shailesh.a@iitb.ac.in
Manchanda R. – Prof., Ph.D., head of Computational NeuroPhysiology Laboratory, e-mail: rmanch@iitb.ac.in
Full Text
Received: 22/03/2016
Accepted: 02/01/1970
