№ 1 / 2017 / 27-31

Modern approaches to treatment of liver hydatid echinococcosis

Author: Kasyev N.B.¹, Аytnazarov M.S.², Nurbekova А.N.³

Abstract

This work presents the results of the radical surgical intervention, which was executed on 281 patients with the hiatus echinus liver. The diagnose of the hiatus echinus liver was established on the basis of general clinical serological, roentgen methods of investigations, but mainly by the results of the ultrasound examination (USE), computer tomography, interperational USE, interoperation revision and morphological verification of the disease. The USE precision at the liver hiatus echinus definition was 91.2 %, computer tomography – 97. 5 %. The radical pericyst-ectomia operations were carried out in 146 patients, resection of the liver in 96, ideal echinococcusectomia – in 39. The specific complications after liver resection were revealed in 4.5 % of cases, and the mortality was 1.1 %. The complications after radical pericyst-ectomia were reveal in 1.5 % of cases, and without mortality. The complications and mortality were not observed after the ideal echinococcusectomia.

Key words

hiatus echinus, radical surgery, the liver resection, pericyst- ectomia, ideal echinococcusectomia

References

1. Aliyev M.A., Seysembayev M.A., Аliyev P.M., Dzhorobekov А.D. Experience liver resection for focal lesions // Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of Surgical Hepatology. 1996. 1. (Suppl.). 189-190. [In Russian]

2. Al’perovich B.I., Merzlikin N.B., Yaroshkina T.N. Surgery intervention at echinococcosis and ways prevention // Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of Surgical Hepatology. 2005. 10. (2). 123-125. [In Russian]

3. Vafin А.Z. General principles of parasitic and anti-parasitic echinococcosis surgery // Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of Surgical Hepatology. 2005. 10. (2) 105. [In Russian]

4. Vecherko.V.N., Konoplya.P.P. Features of diagnostics and treatment of focal damages of a liver with use of a computer tomography // Vestnik khirurgii = Journal of surgery. 1995. (3). 42-44. [In Russian]

5. Vishnevskiy V.А. Improving methods of surgical treatment of focal liver lesions: abstract of thesis…doctor of medical sciences. Moscow, 1990. [In Russian]

6. Zhuravlev V. А. Large and very large liver resections. Saratov: Izdatel’stvo Saratovskogo universiteta, 1986. 216 p. [In Russian]

7. Konstantinov B.А., Got’ye S.V. Surgical classification of focal liver lesions // Khirurgiya = Surgery. 1997. (2). 18-20. [In Russian]

8. Pomelov B.C., Karimov SH.I., Nishanov KH.T. Complications after echinococcusectomia liver and possibilities of their prevention // Khirurgiya = Surgery. 1992. (1). 83-88. [In Russian]

9. Alferi S.G., CarrieroС., Pacelli F. et al. Radical surgery for liver hydatid disease // HBP Surgery. 1998. 9. (Suppl. 2). 2.

10. Androulakis G.A. Surgical management of complicated hydatid cysts in the liver // Eur. Surg. Res. 1988. 18. (3-4). 145-150.

11. Belli L.,Favero E.,Mami A., Romani F.Resecrion versus pericystectomy in the treatment of hydatidosis of the liver // Am. J. Surg. 1983. 145. (2). 610-614.

12. Rovati V., Nervetti G., Faleschini E., Colturni F. Hydatid disease of the liver cystopericistectomy // HBP Surgery. 1996. 9. (Suppl. 2). 195.

About Authors (Correspondence):

Kasyev N.B. – candidate of medical sciences, associate professor, e-mail: kasyev@inbox.ru

Аytnazarov M.S. – candidate of medical sciences

Nurbekova А.N. – student

Received: 15/02/2017