1. Лоскутова Л.В., Дубровина Н.И., Маркель А.Л. Сравнительный анализ условной реакции пассивного избегания у крыс с разными формами наследственной артериальной гипертензии // Рос. физиол. журн. 2006. 92. (4). 440–448.
2. Костюнина Н.В., Лоскутова Л.В. Особенности формирования латентного торможения у крыс SHR в условно-рефлекторных задачах разной сложности // Бюл. эксперим. биологии и медицины. 2012. 153. (1). 4–8.
3. Adams Z.W., Derefinko K.J., Milich R., Fillmore M.T. Inhibitory Functioning across ADHD subtypes: recent findings, clinical implications and future directions // Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev. 2008. 14. (4). 268–275.
4. Behr J., Gloveli T., Schmitz D., Heinemann U. Dopamine depresses excitatory synaptic transmission onto rat subicular neurons via presynaptic D1-like dopamine receptors // J. Neurophysiol. 2000. 84. 112–119.
5. Calzavara M.B., Medrano W.A., Levin R. et al. Neuroleptic drugs revert the contextual fear conditioning deficit presented by spontaneously hypertensive rats: a potential animal model of emotional context processing in schizophrenia // Schiz. Bull. 2009. 35. (4). 748–759.
6. Clements K.M., Wainwright P.E. Spontaneously hypertensive, Wistar Kyoto and Sprague-Dawley rats differ in performance on a win-stay task and a conditioned cue preference task in the water radial arm maze. // Behav. Brain Res. 2007. 183. (2). 169–177.
7. Dela Peña I.C., Kim H.J., Sohn A. et al. Prefrontal cortical and striatal transcriptional responses to the reinforcing effect of repeated methylphenidate treatment in the spontaneously hypertensive rat, animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) // Behav. Brain Funct. 2014. 6. 10–17.
8. Eriksson P.S., Perfilieva E., Bjork-Eriksson T., et al. Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus // Nat. Med. 1998. 4. 1313–1317.
9. Gershman S.J., Blei D.M., Niv Y. Context, learning, and extinction // Psychol. Rev. 2010. 117. (1). 197–209.
10. Gray N.S., Williams J., Fernandez M. et al. Context dependent latent inhibition in adult humans // Q. J. Exp. Psychol. B. 2001. 54. (3). 233–245.
11. Green J.T., Chess A.C., Conquest C.J., Yegla B.A. Conditioned inhibition in a rodent model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder // Behav. Neurosci. 2011. 125. (6). 979–987.
12. Hemsley D.R. The development of a cognitive model of schizophrenia: placing it in context // Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2005. 29. 977–988.
13. Hernandez C.M., Hoifodt H., Terry A.V. Spontaneously hypertensive rats: further evaluation of age-related memory performance and cholinergic marker expression // Psychiatry Neurosci. 2003. 28. (3). 197–209.
14. Honey R.C., Good M. Selective hippocampal lesions abolish the contextual specificity of latent inhibition and conditioning // Behav. Neurosci. 1993. 107. (1). 23–33.
15. Jensen V., Rinholm J.E., Johansen T.J. et al. N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor subunit dysfunction at hippocampal glutamatergic synapses in an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder // Neuroscience. 2009. 158. 353–364.
16. Lubow R.E. Latent inhibition and conditioned attention theory. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 1989. 324 p.
17. Maren S., Phan K.L., Liberzon I. The contextual brain: implications for fear conditioning, extinction and psychopathology // Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2013. 14. (6). 417–428.
18. Mitchell S.N., Yee B.K., Feldon J. et al. Activation of the retrohippocampal region in the rat causes dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens: disruption by fornix section // Eur. Pharmacol. 2000. 407. (1-2). 131–138.
19. Plessen K.J., Bansal R., Zhu H. et al. Hippocampus and amygdala morphology in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder // Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 2006. 63. (7). 795–807.
20. Pouzet B., Zhang W.N., Weiner I. et al. Latent inhibition is spared by N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-induced ventral hippocampal lesions, but is attenuated following local activation of the ventral hippocampus by intracerebral NMDA infusion // Neuroscience. 2004. 124. 183–194.
21. Prediger R.D., Pamplona F.A., Fernandes D., Takahashi R.N. Caffeine improves spatial learning deficits in an animal model of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) – the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) // Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005. 8. 1–12.
22. Quintero E., Díaz E., Vargas J.P. et al. Ventral subiculum involvement in latent inhibition context specificity // Physiol. Behav. 2011. 102. (3-4). 414–420.
23. Sagvolden T., Russell V.A., Aase H. et al. Rodent models of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder // Biol. Psychiatry. 2005. 57. 1239–1247.
24. Sabbatini M., Strocchi P., Vitaioli L., Amenta F. The hippocampus in spontaneously hypertensive rats: a quantitative microanatomical study // Neuroscience. 2000. 100. 251–258.
25. Thanos P.K., Ivanov I., Robinson J.K. et al. Dissociation between spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) and Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats in baseline performance and methylphenidate response on measures of attention, impulsivity and hyperactivity in a visual stimulus position discrimination task // Pharmocol. Biochem. Behav. 2010. 94. (3). 374–379.
26. Westbrook R.F., Jones M.L., Bailey G.K., Harris J.A. Contextual control over conditioned responding in a latent inhibition paradigm // J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 2000. 26. 157–173.
27. Whitlock J.R., Heynen A.J., Shuler M.G., Bear M.F. Learning induces long-term potentiation in the hippocampus // Science. 2006. 313. (5790). 1093–1097.
